black theology, J. Kameron Carter, James Cone

Cone and Carter

As much as I appreciate J. Kameron Carter’s work already and look forward to his forth coming book, Race: A Theological Account, I worry that many people will simply pick up his book and begin to engage race from a contemporary starting point.

Carter is making a critique of Cone, but Carter is also indebted to Cone in a number of fundamental ways. Black theology would not exist today the way it is, if it were not for the space that Cone created (not to mention the entire tradition stretching back centuries even). I suggest that, and I myself will be doing this this summer to refresh and learn things I do not know, we must go back to reading W.E.B. DuBois and others that have carried the tradition forward. Carter, as far as I understand, is still very much in his tradition and we must seek it out. We must not be lazy. Honest theological discussion is hard work.

Also, in some respects, Carter is seeking a fulfillment to what Cone has been yelling about for years, mostly to deaf ears. Cone insists that race is a theological problem. Yet still theology by and large has avoided such a topic. Interestingly, Carter’s book, by virtue of its title alone, is addressing Cone’s direction at the same time it deconstructs and reconstructs. To understand Carter, we will need to understand Cone.


2 thoughts on “Cone and Carter

  1. If I remember right, Carter did his PhD under Milbank at Virginia, so I have a hard time not seeing some sort of Radical Orthodox influence it.

    I did ask Carter, because he went to Dallas Theological Seminary, if he felt some affinity with dispensationalism still. The way he explained his project seemed to share a similar language, but Carter said the similarities went no farther than the surface.

    What I do remember from Carter lining out, is that this is a Christological work primarily grounded in a theology of Israel. He is trying to bring the church out of a supercessionism, back to remembering that Jesus, the Lord, was a Jew. This will extend broader to a differing ecclesiology when compared to Cone’s ontology, if I remember right. Its been a number of months since I talked to him. All in all, hes a really cool guy and looks like he is going somewhere interesting with this project.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s